Census Tract · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally
Rainier Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 53067012530 ·
Thurston County, WA · pop 4,908 · 38% of tract blocks fall in Rainier
The Moderate-tier score of 5.2/10 for census tract 53067012530 reflects conditions in Rainier, Washington. It lands near the 44th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 41% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,393 a month against an average household income of $104,093 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 15% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 9%Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,640
Renter share14.9%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$104,093
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Rainier
Moderate
Within county
45th percentile
#34 of 61 tracts In Thurston County
Moderate
Within state
52th percentile
#860 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
National
61th percentile
#32,735 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rainier and the region
Centroid at 46.8922, -122.7219 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rainier scores 4.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rainier
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,393 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rainier
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rainier
2.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rainier
7.9
How Rainier compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rainier, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Thurston County average of 5.2 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 53067012530
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53067012530?
Census tract 53067012530 in Rainier scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53067012530?
Median gross rent is $1,393/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53067012530?
10.1% of residents in tract 53067012530 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,908.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53067012530?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 52th, minority 28th, housing 31th.
Q5
How does tract 53067012530 compare to Rainier overall?
Tract 53067012530 scores 4.5/10, lower than the parent city of Rainier at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rainier; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.