Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally
Fisk Addition Eviction Risk: Moderate , Green Bay
Tract 55009000500 ·
Brown County, WI · pop 2,844 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 55009000500 (the Fisk Addition neighborhood of Green Bay, Wisconsin) comes in at 3.8/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than about 8% of US census tracts.
About 26% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,032 monthly, set against $58,670 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 33% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 24%Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,356
Renter share32.8%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$58,670
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fisk Addition
Moderate
Within parent city
46th percentile
#15 of 27 tracts In Green Bay
Moderate
Within county
67th percentile
#20 of 58 tracts In Brown County
Elevated
Within state
72th percentile
#434 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Green Bay and the region
Centroid at 44.5200, -88.0334 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fisk Addition scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Green Bay
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,032 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Green Bay
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Green Bay
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Green Bay
3.0
How Fisk Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 50
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
55%Socioeconomic
61%Household composition
28%Racial/ethnic minority
41%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
322Total filings over 10 yrs
7.12%Avg annual filing rate
10.7%Peak (2014)
35Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2017
Filings climbed 46% over the past 10 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
13.6%Housing insecurity
7.7%Utility-shutoff threat
16.2%Food insecurity
16.7%SNAP enrollment
8.9%Transit barriers
9.9%No health insurance
17.8%Frequent mental distress
29.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fisk Addition
What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Green Bay eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Brown County average of 4.3 and below the Wisconsin statewide average of 4.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 13.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 55009000500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55009000500?
Census tract 55009000500 in the Fisk Addition neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 55009000500?
Median gross rent is $1,032/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 55009000500?
11.3% of residents in tract 55009000500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,844.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 55009000500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 61th, minority 28th, housing 41th.
Q5
Is tract 55009000500 considered part of Fisk Addition?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55009000500 fall within Fisk Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55009000500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 322 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 55009000500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.12% of renter households, peaking at 10.7% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 55009000500 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 55009000500 compare to Green Bay overall?
Tract 55009000500 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Green Bay at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Green Bay eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Green Bay
Top eight tracts in Green Bay ranked by composite eviction-risk score.