Neighborhood · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally
Birch Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Wrightstown
Tract 55009021400 ·
Brown County, WI · pop 8,514 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 55009021400 covers the Birch Creek area of Wrightstown, home to 8,514 residents. For landlords it grades 3.3/10, a lower reading. It lands near the 3rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
10% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $959 a month against an average household income of $107,332 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 22%Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units3,325
Renter share24.3%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate2.0%
Median income$107,332
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Birch Creek
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Wrightstown
Moderate
Within county
11th percentile
#52 of 58 tracts In Brown County
Very Low
Within state
9th percentile
#1,397 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Wrightstown and the region
Centroid at 44.3451, -88.0743 · click any tract to drill in
Why Birch Creek scores 1.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Wrightstown
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
2.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$959 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Wrightstown
3.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Wrightstown
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Wrightstown
2.4
How Birch Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
11%Socioeconomic
39%Household composition
24%Racial/ethnic minority
58%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
106Total filings over 10 yrs
1.92%Avg annual filing rate
3.2%Peak (2012)
15Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year2001 to 2017
Filings climbed 200% over the past 10 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.0%Housing insecurity
4.4%Utility-shutoff threat
8.6%Food insecurity
8.3%SNAP enrollment
5.3%Transit barriers
6.3%No health insurance
15.0%Frequent mental distress
23.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Birch Creek
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Wrightstown, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Brown County average of 4.3 and below the Wisconsin statewide average of 4.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 55009021400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55009021400?
Census tract 55009021400 in the Birch Creek neighborhood scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 55009021400?
Median gross rent is $959/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 55009021400?
2.0% of residents in tract 55009021400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,514.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 55009021400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 39th, minority 24th, housing 58th.
Q5
Is tract 55009021400 considered part of Birch Creek?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55009021400 fall within Birch Creek (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55009021400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 106 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 55009021400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.92% of renter households, peaking at 3.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 55009021400 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 55009021400 compare to Wrightstown overall?
Tract 55009021400 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Wrightstown at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Wrightstown; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.