Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

Elm Lane Eviction Risk: Lower , Brookfield

Tract 55133200500 · Waukesha County, WI · pop 6,322 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 4.4/10 for census tract 55133200500 reflects conditions in the Elm Lane area of Brookfield, Wisconsin. It lands near the 19th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 94% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 89% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,418 monthly, set against $131,358 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 11% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 1% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units2,428
Renter share10.7%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$131,358

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Elm Lane
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Brookfield
Very Low
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#97 of 98 tracts In Waukesha County
Very Low
Within state
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#1,503 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Brookfield and the region

Centroid at 43.1120, -88.1098 · click any tract to drill in

Why Elm Lane scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brookfield
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,418 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brookfield
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brookfield
5.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brookfield
4.2

How Elm Lane compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Elm Lane risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.11.1This tracttract 200500Brookfield: 2.72.7Brookfieldparent cityCounty: 1.91.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.43.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 1.71%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.9%Peak (2002)
  • 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 551332005002002: 1 filings (1.89/100 renter HHs)2009: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2010: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (1.52/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Elm Lane. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Elm Lane

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Brookfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Waukesha County average of 3.8 and in line with the Wisconsin statewide average of 4.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 1.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.9% of renter households in 2002.

In CDC survey modeling, about 5.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 55133200500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55133200500?

Census tract 55133200500 in the Elm Lane neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55133200500?

Median gross rent is $2,418/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 94% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55133200500?

2.2% of residents in tract 55133200500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,322.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55133200500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 41th, minority 23th, housing 18th.
Q5

Is tract 55133200500 considered part of Elm Lane?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55133200500 fall within Elm Lane (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55133200500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 55133200500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.71% of renter households, peaking at 1.9% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 55133200500 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 55133200500 compare to Brookfield overall?

Tract 55133200500 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Brookfield at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brookfield eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Brookfield

Top eight tracts in Brookfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related