Morgan County, Tennessee Eviction Risk: Very Low
5 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Coalfield (2.7) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #74 of 95 TN counties
5k residents · 5 cities · 5 tracts
Morgan County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord14.4%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Morgan County, TN, tenants prevail in roughly 14.4% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline35dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Morgan County, TN until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 35 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.0–2.7klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Morgan County, TN costs landlords $1,024 to $2,721 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$83729% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Morgan County, TN is $837 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 29% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters25.3%of households25.3% of occupied housing units in Morgan County, TN are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty24.6%8.7% unemp.24.6% of Morgan County, TN residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 8.7%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Morgan County's composite eviction-risk score of 2.2/10 (Very Low) reflects a landlord-favorable legal environment tempered by a 24.6% poverty rate and a 30-day pre-filing notice requirement under TCA Title 29, Chapter 18. Ranked 74th of 95 Tennessee counties - placing Morgan County in the lower-risk of the state, with 73 counties carrying higher risk for landlords.
How Morgan County ranks in Tennessee
Landlord guides for Tennessee
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Coalfield | 2,754 | 1.9 | 31.0% | $1,037 | Rep |
| 002 | Wartburg | 1,191 | 2.7 | 30.4% | $478 | Rep |
| 003 | Sunbright | 792 | 2.5 | 23.1% | $765 | Rep |
| 004 | Petros | 352 | 1.6 | 27.5% | $593 | Rep |
| 005 | Oakdale | 175 | 2.2 | 10.1% | $945 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Morgan County sits in the lower-risk of Tennessee eviction laws for eviction risk, earning a composite score of 2.2/10 (Very Low) and ranking 74th of 95 counties statewide - meaning 73 counties carry higher risk for landlords. Tucked into the Cumberland Plateau roughly 50 miles northwest of Knoxville eviction risk, the county is small by Tennessee eviction laws standards: a total rental population of about 5,264 residents, a 25.3% renter-occupancy rate, and an average rent of $837 per month keep the market stable but economically modest. The poverty rate of 24.6% is notably elevated above state norms, which explains a meaningful share of the rent-burden pressure - 28.7% of renter households spend more than 30% of income on housing - yet the county's legal framework keeps landlord risk contained.
Morgan County falls below the 75,000-population threshold that triggers application of the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (URLTA), so proceedings are governed by TCA Title 29, Chapter 18 rather than the URLTA framework. In practical terms, that means a 30-day notice to quit is required before filing for nonpayment - longer than the 7-day URLTA notice landlords use in larger Tennessee eviction laws markets - but court timelines are comparable once the filing is made. Uncontested cases typically conclude in 21 to 45 days from filing; contested matters run 45 to 120 days. Filing fees at the general sessions court run $200 to $300, sheriff lockout fees add $40 to $150, and attorney costs range from $500 to $2,500 for contested matters. Tennessee eviction laws imposes no rent-control requirements, and state law (T.C.A. § 36-28) expressly preempts any municipality from enacting its own rent caps, so neither Wartburg nor any other community in the county can add that layer of risk.
Risk varies across the county's five incorporated places. Coalfield (pop. 2,754) is the largest community and scores 1.9/10, landing at the lower end of the county range. The county seat, Wartburg (pop. 1,191), carries the highest individual score at 2.7/10, reflecting its slightly denser rental market and higher concentration of cost-burdened households. Sunbright (pop. 792) comes in at 2.5/10, while Oakdale (pop. 175) matches the county average at 2.2/10. Petros (pop. 352) posts the lowest reading in the county at 1.6/10. The spread from 1.6 to 2.7 is narrow compared to more urban Tennessee counties, signaling that no single community faces dramatically elevated exposure - a useful baseline for landlords weighing acquisitions across multiple Morgan County communities.
Morgan County's Very Low risk rating reflects a combination of landlord-favorable state law, a small and relatively stable rental market, and the absence of any local tenant-protection ordinances. The primary risk driver for landlords is the county's elevated poverty rate (24.6%), which increases the probability of rent-collection disruptions - but that factor is offset by relatively short court timelines and no just-cause eviction requirement under Tennessee eviction laws law.
How Morgan County compares
Morgan County's 2.2/10 sits right at the 2.4 average for Tennessee, and its closest peer counties - Union, White, Moore, Crockett, and Wayne - all land within a very narrow band of similar risk. None of those peers presents meaningfully higher or lower exposure for landlords. What distinguishes Morgan County from higher-risk Tennessee eviction laws counties is the absence of dense urban rental markets and the lack of any locally enacted tenant protections; what separates it from the handful of lower-risk counties is its elevated poverty rate, which introduces more rent-collection uncertainty than in wealthier rural markets.