Skip to content
Eviction risk map of Smith County, Tennessee showing a 2.1/10 average score (Very Low tier), ranked 86th of 95 counties statewide
County brief·Updated June 24, 2026

Smith County, Tennessee Eviction Risk: Very Low

4 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of South Carthage (2.3) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

Ranked #86 of 95 TN counties

6k residents · 4 cities · 5 tracts

1976–2026 · pop-weighted from cities

Smith County eviction risk score history

Min2.1 Average2.7 Now2.1
10 5 1976 · score 3.2 1977 · score 3.2 1978 · score 3.2 1979 · score 3.2 1980 · score 3.3 1981 · score 3.3 1982 · score 3.3 1983 · score 3.2 1984 · score 3.1 1985 · score 2.9 1986 · score 2.9 1987 · score 2.7 1988 · score 2.6 1989 · score 2.2 1990 · score 2.2 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.7 1999 · score 2.7 2000 · score 2.7 2001 · score 2.8 2002 · score 2.8 2003 · score 2.8 2004 · score 2.8 2005 · score 2.7 2006 · score 2.6 2007 · score 2.5 2008 · score 2.6 2009 · score 2.8 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.8 2012 · score 2.7 2013 · score 2.6 2014 · score 2.5 2015 · score 2.4 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.3 2018 · score 2.2 2019 · score 2.2 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 3.1 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.2 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Smith County's 2.1/10 (Very Low) reflects a low-regulation rural environment with scores ranging from 1.9 in Carthage to 2.3 in South Carthage. Ranked 86th of 95 Tennessee counties - 85 counties carry higher risk.

How Smith County ranks in Tennessee

Lower number means more extreme, where #1 is the most
Eviction Risk Score
Very Low
#86 of 95 TN counties 2.1 / 10
Eviction Risk Score, 10th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 95 counties in Tennessee for landlord eviction risk.
Cost of living
Low
#38 of 51 states (statewide) 91.9 index
Cost of living, 26th percentileLowHigh
Tennessee ranks #38 of 51 states on overall cost of living (8.1% cheaper than the U.S. avg).
Housing services cost
Low
#33 of 51 states (statewide) 79.1 index
Housing services cost, 36th percentileLowHigh
Tennessee ranks #33 of 51 states on housing services (20.9% cheaper than the U.S. avg).
Income spent on rent
Low
#58 of 95 TN counties 26.9% of income
Income spent on rent, 39th percentileLowHigh
#58 of 95 counties in Tennessee on % of income spent on rent.

Landlord guides for Tennessee

State-specific playbooks
Tennessee Eviction Costs →
Filing fees, attorney fees, lost rent, sheriff lockout
Tennessee Eviction Process →
Step-by-step timeline, notices, statute cites
Tennessee Rent Control →
Statewide caps, local ordinances, just-cause
Tennessee Tenant Screening →
Five-point protocol, legal rules, protected classes
Tennessee Tenant Protections →
Just cause, retaliation, habitability, entry
Cities in Smith County
Sorted by Eviction Risk Score · highest first
Map view
CityPopulationRisk% income on rentAverage rentLean
001 South Carthage Pop 2,364 · 29.1% income · $939 rent · Rep 2,364 2.3 29.1% $939 Rep
002 Carthage Pop 2,327 · 22.9% income · $934 rent · Rep 2,327 1.9 22.9% $934 Rep
003 Gordonsville Pop 1,299 · 27.9% income · $889 rent · Rep 1,299 2.0 27.9% $889 Rep
004 Hickman Pop 276 · 27.7% income · $904 rent · Rep 276 2.0 27.7% $904 Rep

County heatmap

Geographic distribution
Local landlord context

One county, multiple regulatory regimes.

Smith County sits firmly in the Very Low tier of Tennessee eviction laws's eviction-risk spectrum, with a county average of 2.1/10 - ranking 86th out of 95 counties statewide, where rank 1 represents the highest risk. That position means 85 Tennessee eviction laws counties carry greater eviction risk for landlords than Smith County, while only 9 rank lower. The score range across the county's four incorporated places runs from 1.9 to 2.3, a narrow band that reflects a relatively consistent regulatory and economic environment throughout this rural Upper Cumberland community.

The county seat is Carthage (1.9/10, population 2,327), the historic center of government and commerce on the Cumberland River. Directly across the river, South Carthage posts the highest local reading at 2.3/10 among 2,364 residents - the single largest concentration of renters in the county and the community that nudges the county's ceiling to 2.3. Gordonsville (2/10, population 1,299) and the small community of Hickman (2/10, population 276) round out the four incorporated places. Together these four towns account for roughly 6,266 residents, with 37.7% renting - a moderate renter share for rural Middle Tennessee.

Economically, Smith County renters pay an average of $925 per month, and the average renter household puts 26.5% of gross income toward rent - below the nationally watched 30% threshold that signals housing stress. Still, the county's 16% poverty rate means a meaningful share of tenants operate with little financial buffer, which shapes both eviction frequency and contested-case outcomes. For landlords, the practical takeaway is straightforward: Smith County is among the lower-risk counties in Tennessee eviction laws by eviction risk, the regulatory environment is light, there is no local rent control (state law preempts it outright), and no just-cause requirement applies before issuing a notice to vacate. Court filing fees run $200 to $300, and an uncontested case typically wraps in 21 to 45 days through Smith County General Sessions Court.

Smith County falls under TCA Title 29, Chapter 18 rather than the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (URLTA), because its population is below the 75,000-person threshold. That distinction matters: landlords here issue a 30-day notice to vacate for most terminations, rather than the 7-day nonpayment notice available in URLTA counties. Tennessee eviction laws's statewide preemption statute blocks any municipality in Smith County from enacting rent caps or local just-cause ordinances, so the legal framework is uniform across Carthage, South Carthage, Gordonsville, and Hickman. Habitability duties fall under T.C.A. § 66-28-304, and retaliation protections run to landlords under T.C.A. § 66-28-514. Source-of-income (housing voucher) discrimination is not a protected class under Tennessee eviction laws fair housing law.

How Smith County compares

Smith County's 2.1/10 average sits slightly below the Tennessee statewide average of 2.4/10, consistent with its rural character and relatively light regulatory environment. Nearby peer counties - including Hickman, Crockett, Union, Moore, and Morgan - cluster in a similar range, all landing in the lower-risk segment of the state distribution. Compared to higher-risk urban counties such as Shelby (Memphis eviction risk) or Davidson (Nashville eviction risk), Smith County presents a materially different risk profile: no URLTA applicability, no rent control pressure, and a smaller renter population with lower average rent burdens.

Peer counties in Tennessee

Same state, closest by population and Eviction Risk Score
Peer county
Hickman County eviction risk
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 6.6K
Peer county
Crockett County eviction risk
2.1
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 6.5K
Peer county
Union County eviction risk
2.2
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 6.1K
Peer county
Moore County eviction risk
2.2
/ 10 · Low
Pop. 6.5K

Where eviction risk concentrates in Smith County

Top cities + top neighborhoods · click any card for the full breakdown

Top cities by population

Frequently asked

Frequently asked questions about Smith County

Q1

How many renters live in Smith County?

Renter share is 37.7%, so approximately 2,359 of Smith County's 6,266 residents are renters.
Q2

What is the lowest-risk city in Smith County?

The lowest score in Smith County is 1.9/10. See the city grid above for the specific municipality.
Q3

What is the highest-risk city in Smith County?

The highest score in Smith County is 2.3/10. See the city grid above for the specific municipality.