Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally
Poynor Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48213951402 ·
Henderson County, TX · pop 1,971 · 14% of tract blocks fall in Poynor
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48213951402 (Poynor, Texas) comes in at 3.4/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than roughly 4% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 11% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,006 monthly, set against $100,417 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 11%Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units874
Renter share12.0%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$100,417
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Poynor
Moderate
Within county
0th percentile
#28 of 28 tracts In Henderson County
Very Low
Within state
15th percentile
#5,833 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
15th percentile
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Poynor and the region
Centroid at 32.1316, -95.6452 · click any tract to drill in
Why Poynor scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Poynor
2.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,006 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Poynor
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Poynor
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Poynor
4.0
How Poynor compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 42
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Poynor, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Henderson County average of 4.8 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 48213951402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48213951402?
Census tract 48213951402 in Poynor scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48213951402?
Median gross rent is $1,006/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 11% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48213951402?
6.5% of residents in tract 48213951402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,971.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48213951402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 44th, household 46th, minority 29th, housing 44th.
Q5
How does tract 48213951402 compare to Poynor overall?
Tract 48213951402 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Poynor at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Poynor; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.