Mineral Wells Eviction Risk: Moderate

The voucher gap is 34.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.8/10. The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,357, 26% above the Mineral Wells average.

The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. That is riskier than roughly 46% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.4/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Palo Pinto County average of 4.0 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.