Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Ridgeline Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Millville

Tract 49005001202 · Cache, UT · pop 7,160 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Census tract 49005001202 covers part of the Ridgeline Park area of Nibley, UT, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 7,160 residents. Cost burden runs 59% here against 37.0% across Cache County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 6% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,123
Renter share14.6%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$101,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Ridgeline Park
Very Low
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Millville
Moderate
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 28 tracts In Cache
Moderate
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#425 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Millville and the region

Centroid at 41.6716, -111.8562 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ridgeline Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Millville
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,586 rent vs county FMR
8.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Millville
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Millville
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Millville
6.5

How Ridgeline Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ridgeline Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0012023.1Millvilleparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 8Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 1.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.8%Peak (2015)
  • 2Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2006 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 49005001202
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ridgeline Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ridgeline Park

The voucher gap is 35.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Pulling hardest the other way is court filing pressure at 0.9/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.1/10.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10. The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

It sits 0.9 points below the Cache County average of 3.9. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 filings here across 4 tracked years.

SNAP participation runs 7.5% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2015, when 1.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 1.8% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 15% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Social vulnerability reads 3.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 49005001202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49005001202?

Census tract 49005001202 in the Ridgeline Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49005001202?

Median gross rent is $1,586/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49005001202?

6.5% of residents in tract 49005001202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,160.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49005001202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 45th, minority 32th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 49005001202 considered part of Ridgeline Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49005001202 fall within Ridgeline Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49005001202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 49005001202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.79% of renter households, peaking at 1.8% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 49005001202 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 49005001202 compare to Millville overall?

Tract 49005001202 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Millville at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Millville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related