Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Greenfield Eviction Risk: Lower , Riverton
Tract 49035113014 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 5,515 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 49035113014 covers part of the Greenfield area of Riverton, UT, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,515. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 4%
Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,903
Renter share6.4%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$107,330
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Within county
19
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Riverton and the region
Centroid at 40.5309, -111.9485 · click any tract to drill in
Why Greenfield scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Riverton
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,739 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Riverton
4.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Riverton
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Riverton
3.7
How Greenfield compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 39%Household composition
- 26%Racial/ethnic minority
- 2%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 24Total filings over 8 yrs
- 2.86%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.8%Peak (2011)
- 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 33% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Greenfield. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 4.6%SNAP enrollment
- 5.7%Transit barriers
- 7.9%No health insurance
- 17.3%Frequent mental distress
- 26.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Greenfield
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.9/10. SNAP participation runs 4.6% against 15.2% nationally.
At $1,739 a month, rents run 19% under what the rest of Riverton commands. Against Salt Lake County at 42.4%, 38% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 24 filings here across 8 tracked years.
Against the Salt Lake County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Food insecurity runs 10.2% against 17.8% nationally. The worst year on record was 2011, when 7.8% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
Only 6% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 49035113014
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035113014?
Census tract 49035113014 in the Greenfield neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49035113014?
Median gross rent is $1,739/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035113014?
3.6% of residents in tract 49035113014 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,515.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035113014?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 39th, minority 26th, housing 2th.
Q5
Is tract 49035113014 considered part of Greenfield?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035113014 fall within Greenfield (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035113014?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 24 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 49035113014 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.86% of renter households, peaking at 7.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 49035113014 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 49035113014 compare to Riverton overall?
Tract 49035113014 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Riverton at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Riverton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Riverton
Top eight tracts in Riverton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related