Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Glenmoor Village Eviction Risk: Lower , South Jordan
Tract 49035113007 · Salt Lake, UT · pop 4,647 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Here is how census tract 49035113007, in the Glenmoor Village area of South Jordan eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 3.4/10 eviction-risk score (Lower tier) across a population of 4,647. It lands near the 4th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 0% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $131,066 a year. About 1% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 1%
Owners 99%
Tract context
Occupied units1,432
Renter share0.6%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$131,066
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
25
th percentile
Low
Within county
8
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across South Jordan and the region
Centroid at 40.5733, -111.9958 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glenmoor Village scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from South Jordan
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Jordan
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Jordan
3.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Jordan
4.0
How Glenmoor Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 5
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 6%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 13Total filings over 9 yrs
- 3.67%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.0%Peak (2011)
- 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.6%Housing insecurity
- 5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.4%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.7%Transit barriers
- 8.4%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 26.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Glenmoor Village
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 5.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from South Jordan eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Salt Lake County average of 4.4 and below the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 13 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 3.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.0% of renter households in 2011.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 49035113007
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49035113007?
Census tract 49035113007 in the Glenmoor Village neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 49035113007?
1.8% of residents in tract 49035113007 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,647.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 49035113007?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 20th, minority 28th, housing 6th.
Q4
Is tract 49035113007 considered part of Glenmoor Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49035113007 fall within Glenmoor Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 49035113007?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 13 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 49035113007 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.67% of renter households, peaking at 4.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 49035113007 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49035113007 compare to South Jordan overall?
Tract 49035113007 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of South Jordan at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Jordan eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in South Jordan
Top eight tracts in South Jordan ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · UT
County Cove
2.2
/ 10 · Low
Tract · UT
Jordan Heights
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
North Station District
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Maxfield
1.5
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Eastlake Village
1.4
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Sand Dunes
1.2
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Founders Park Village
1.2
/ 10 · Very Low
Tract · UT
Heritage Heights
1.2
/ 10 · Very Low
Related