Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Washington Fields Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 49053270804 · Washington, UT · pop 6,501 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
49053270804 is a census tract in the Washington Fields area of Washington, UT. It scores 3/10 for landlords. 69% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Washington County average of 49.4%.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 2%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,589
Renter share8.0%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate1.5%
Median income$119,922
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
6
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
41
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Washington and the region
Centroid at 37.0954, -113.5115 · click any tract to drill in
Why Washington Fields scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Washington
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
1.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,246 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Washington
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Washington
5.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Washington
4.9
How Washington Fields compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 18%Household composition
- 5%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.1%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.0%Food insecurity
- 4.0%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 7.1%No health insurance
- 15.5%Frequent mental distress
- 25.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Washington Fields
What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 10/10. The severe-burden share is 35%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 51.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Average gross rent is $2,246, 39% above the Washington average. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.
Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.3/10. Food insecurity runs 8.0% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 7.1% against 14.2% nationally.
Against the Washington County average of 3.6, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 49053270804
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49053270804?
Census tract 49053270804 in the Washington Fields neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 49053270804?
Median gross rent is $2,246/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 49053270804?
1.5% of residents in tract 49053270804 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,501.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 49053270804?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 18th, minority 5th, housing 3th.
Q5
Is tract 49053270804 considered part of Washington Fields?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49053270804 fall within Washington Fields (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 49053270804 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 49053270804 compare to Washington overall?
Tract 49053270804 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Washington at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Washington eviction laws; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Washington
Top eight tracts in Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related