Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,998 of 84,120 nationally

Washington Fields Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 49053270804 · Washington, UT · pop 6,501 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 4.2/10 for census tract 49053270804 reflects conditions in the Washington Fields area of Washington, Utah. On the national scale it ranks #71,580 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 69% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,246 a month against an average household income of $119,922 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 2% Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,589
Renter share8.0%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate1.5%
Median income$119,922

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Washington Fields
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#35 of 35 tracts In Washington
Very Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#585 of 716 tracts In Utah
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Washington and the region

Centroid at 37.0954, -113.5115 · click any tract to drill in

Why Washington Fields scores 1.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Washington
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
1.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,246 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Washington
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Washington
5.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Washington
4.9

How Washington Fields compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Washington Fields risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.41.4This tracttract 270804Washington: 2.02.0Washingtonparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 2.62.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Washington Fields

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Washington eviction laws, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Washington County average of 3.4 and in line with the Utah statewide average of 4.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 3rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 49053270804

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49053270804?

Census tract 49053270804 in the Washington Fields neighborhood scores 1.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 49053270804?

Median gross rent is $2,246/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 49053270804?

1.5% of residents in tract 49053270804 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,501.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 49053270804?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 18th, minority 5th, housing 3th.
Q5

Is tract 49053270804 considered part of Washington Fields?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 49053270804 fall within Washington Fields (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 49053270804 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 49053270804 compare to Washington overall?

Tract 49053270804 scores 1.4/10, lower than the parent city of Washington at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Washington eviction laws; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Washington

Top eight tracts in Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related