Census Tract · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally
Jericho Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 50007002800 ·
Chittenden County, VT · pop 5,105 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Jericho
Census tract 50007002800 runs through Jericho. With 5,105 residents, it scores 5.3/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 48% of US census tracts.
78% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,720 monthly, set against $115,223 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 2%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units2,061
Renter share7.8%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate1.2%
Median income$115,223
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Jericho
Moderate
Within county
0th percentile
#41 of 41 tracts In Chittenden County
Very Low
Within state
0th percentile
#193 of 193 tracts In Vermont
Very Low
National
6th percentile
#79,124 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Jericho and the region
Centroid at 44.4645, -72.9632 · click any tract to drill in
Why Jericho scores 1.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Jericho
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.7
State political climate
Vermont legislature & governorship
4.6
Economic stress
1.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,720 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Jericho
9.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Jericho
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Jericho
5.7
How Jericho compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Jericho eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Chittenden County average of 5.1 and in line with the Vermont statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 50007002800
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 50007002800?
Census tract 50007002800 in Jericho scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 50007002800?
Median gross rent is $1,720/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 50007002800?
1.2% of residents in tract 50007002800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,105.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 50007002800?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 5th, minority 10th, housing 9th.
Q5
How does tract 50007002800 compare to Jericho overall?
Tract 50007002800 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Jericho at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Jericho eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.