Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally

Brighton Beach Eviction Risk: Elevated , Mercer Island

Tract 53033011102 · King County, WA · pop 5,468 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Census tract 53033011102 covers part of the Brighton Beach area of Seattle, WA, and scores 7.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,468 residents. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 9.5/10.

Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 23% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,959
Renter share47.3%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate5.9%
Median income$112,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Brighton Beach
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#89 of 177 tracts In Mercer Island
Moderate
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#147 of 494 tracts In King County
Elevated
Within state
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#253 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mercer Island and the region

Centroid at 47.5425, -122.2604 · click any tract to drill in

Why Brighton Beach scores 7.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mercer Island
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
5.9% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,703 rent vs county FMR
1.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mercer Island
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mercer Island
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mercer Island
8.5

How Brighton Beach compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Brighton Beach risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.6This tracttract 0111026.2Mercer Islandparent city6.7Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 266Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 4.31%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.3%Peak (2006)
  • 16Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 53033011102
Filings dropped 58% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Brighton Beach. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Brighton Beach

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 9/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.

Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Cost burden runs 51% here against 44.1% across King County. At $1,703 a month, rents run 16% under what the rest of Seattle commands.

The filing record is not thin: 266 evictions over 10 years of observation. Against the King County average of 6.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.9 points.

Filings peaked in 2006 at 9.3% of renter households. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Seattle. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.3% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 53033011102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53033011102?

Census tract 53033011102 in the Brighton Beach neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53033011102?

Median gross rent is $1,703/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53033011102?

5.9% of residents in tract 53033011102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,468.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53033011102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 48th, minority 70th, housing 91th.
Q5

Is tract 53033011102 considered part of Brighton Beach?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53033011102 fall within Brighton Beach (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53033011102?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 266 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 53033011102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.31% of renter households, peaking at 9.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53033011102 compare to Mercer Island overall?

Tract 53033011102 scores 7.6/10, higher than the parent city of Mercer Island at 6.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mercer Island eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 53033011102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mercer Island

Top eight tracts in Mercer Island ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related