Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally

Graham Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 53053073118 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,944 · 85% of tract blocks fall in Graham

With a score of 4.1/10, tract 53053073118 in Graham, WA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,944. 59% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 3% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,759
Renter share8.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$109,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 tracts In Graham
Elevated
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#144 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,456 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#47,371 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Graham and the region

Centroid at 47.0450, -122.2380 · click any tract to drill in

Why Graham scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Graham
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$3,017 rent vs county FMR
9.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Graham
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Graham
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Graham
4.0

How Graham compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Graham risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.1This tracttract 0731184.4Grahamparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 55Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.7%Peak (2009)
  • 4Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 53053073118
Filings dropped 56% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 9Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.33×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Graham

Against Pierce County at 47.5%, 70% of renters here are cost-burdened. At $3,017 a month, rents run 44% over what the rest of Graham commands.

The voucher gap is 46.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.7/10.

Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $109,563, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Against the Pierce County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.2/10. The filing record is not thin: 55 evictions over 11 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2009, when 9.7% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.0% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #47,371 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053073118

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053073118?

Census tract 53053073118 in Graham scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053073118?

Median gross rent is $3,017/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053073118?

9.0% of residents in tract 53053073118 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,944.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053073118?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 40th, minority 46th, housing 52th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053073118?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053073118 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.02% of renter households, peaking at 9.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 53053073118 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 53053073118 compare to Graham overall?

Tract 53053073118 scores 4.1/10, lower than the parent city of Graham at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Graham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Graham

Top eight tracts in Graham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related