Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Graham Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53053073118 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,944 · 85% of tract blocks fall in Graham

With a score of 5.6/10, tract 53053073118 in Graham in Pierce County ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,944 residents. That is riskier than about 59% of US census tracts.

70% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 59% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,017 a month against an average household income of $109,563 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 3% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,759
Renter share8.4%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$109,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 8 tracts In Graham
Elevated
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#137 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Low
Within state
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#1,474 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Graham and the region

Centroid at 47.0450, -122.2380 · click any tract to drill in

Why Graham scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Graham
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$3,017 rent vs county FMR
9.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Graham
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Graham
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Graham
4.0

How Graham compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Graham risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 073118Graham: 6.96.9Grahamparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 55Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 4.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.7%Peak (2009)
  • 4Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530530731182004: 9 filings (6.87/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (3.88/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (4.85/100 renter HHs)2007: 2 filings (1.94/100 renter HHs)2008: 2 filings (1.94/100 renter HHs)2009: 10 filings (9.71/100 renter HHs)2010: 5 filings (2.69/100 renter HHs)2012: 3 filings (2.05/100 renter HHs)2013: 8 filings (5.48/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (2.05/100 renter HHs)2015: 4 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 56% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 9Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.33×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (3.03× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (2.99× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (6.06× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (1.49× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Graham

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Graham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Pierce County average of 5.5 and above the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.33x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 39th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053073118

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053073118?

Census tract 53053073118 in Graham scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053073118?

Median gross rent is $3,017/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 70% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053073118?

9.0% of residents in tract 53053073118 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,944.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053073118?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 40th, minority 46th, housing 52th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053073118?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 53053073118 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.02% of renter households, peaking at 9.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 53053073118 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.33× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 53053073118 compare to Graham overall?

Tract 53053073118 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Graham at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Graham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Graham

Top eight tracts in Graham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related