Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Lake Roesiger Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 53061053606 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 3,409 · 11% of tract blocks fall in Lake Roesiger
With a score of 3.8/10, tract 53061053606 in Lake Roesiger, WA reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,409 residents. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 6%
Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,363
Renter share9.3%
SVI overall0.07
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$115,812
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
20
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
15
th percentile
Very Low
National
38
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lake Roesiger and the region
Centroid at 48.0123, -121.6783 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lake Roesiger scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,473 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake Roesiger
4.3
How Lake Roesiger compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 18%Socioeconomic
- 31%Household composition
- 16%Racial/ethnic minority
- 5%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lake Roesiger
Cost burden runs around a third here against 47.3% across Snohomish County. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Against the Snohomish County average of 5.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.6 points. On the softer side, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.5/10.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.8/10. Nationally it ranks #52,479 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 9% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 1.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $115,812, annual rent is just 15%.
Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 2.1 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent is $1,473, close to the Lake Roesiger average.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 53061053606
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061053606?
Census tract 53061053606 in Lake Roesiger scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53061053606?
Median gross rent is $1,473/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53061053606?
11.3% of residents in tract 53061053606 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,409.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53061053606?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 7th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 31th, minority 16th, housing 5th.
Q5
How does tract 53061053606 compare to Lake Roesiger overall?
Tract 53061053606 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Lake Roesiger at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake Roesiger; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related