Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Bissel Eviction Risk: Lower , Bristol

Tract 55059002700 · Kenosha County, WI · pop 6,673 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 55059002700 covers part of the Bissel area of Bristol, WI, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 16% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,574
Renter share22.2%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$118,235

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bissel
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Bristol
Moderate
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#33 of 42 tracts In Kenosha County
Low
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1,083 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Bristol and the region

Centroid at 42.5422, -88.0112 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bissel scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Bristol
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.8
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,654 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Bristol
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Bristol
4.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Bristol
1.8

How Bissel compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bissel risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 002700Bristol: 3.23.2Bristolparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 123Total filings over 12 yrs
  • 2.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.0%Peak (2017)
  • 16Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550590027002002: 4 filings (1.40/100 renter HHs)2007: 12 filings (3.15/100 renter HHs)2008: 6 filings (1.58/100 renter HHs)2009: 11 filings (2.89/100 renter HHs)2010: 12 filings (3.68/100 renter HHs)2011: 10 filings (2.56/100 renter HHs)2012: 12 filings (3.07/100 renter HHs)2013: 9 filings (2.30/100 renter HHs)2014: 11 filings (2.81/100 renter HHs)2015: 11 filings (2.81/100 renter HHs)2016: 9 filings (2.23/100 renter HHs)2017: 16 filings (3.96/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 300% over the past 12 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bissel

29% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Kenosha County average of 40.9%. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.7/10. 19% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

At $1,654 a month, rents run 25% over what the rest of Bristol commands. Well under the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 1.8/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 123 filings here across 12 tracked years. The voucher gap is 14.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Against the Kenosha County average of 3.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. Housing insecurity runs 7.1% against 14.2% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2017 at 4.0% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.7% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 22% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 55059002700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55059002700?

Census tract 55059002700 in the Bissel neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55059002700?

Median gross rent is $1,654/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55059002700?

2.4% of residents in tract 55059002700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,673.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55059002700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 15th, minority 14th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 55059002700 considered part of Bissel?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55059002700 fall within Bissel (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55059002700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 123 eviction filings across 12 validated years in tract 55059002700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.70% of renter households, peaking at 4.0% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 55059002700 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 55059002700 compare to Bristol overall?

Tract 55059002700 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Bristol at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Bristol; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related