Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #48,956 of 84,120 nationally

Cudahy Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 55079180200 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 4,438

With a score of 4/10, tract 55079180200 in Cudahy, WI reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,438. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 8.1/10.

Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 31% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units2,194
Renter share49.0%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate14.7%
Median income$64,492

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Cudahy
High
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#183 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
Low
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#601 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Elevated
National
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#48,956 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cudahy and the region

Centroid at 42.9547, -87.8551 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cudahy scores 4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cudahy
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
14.7% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$991 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cudahy
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cudahy
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cudahy
5.2

How Cudahy compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cudahy risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.04.0This tracttract 180200Cudahy: 4.04.0Cudahyparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 606Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 4.23%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2011)
  • 50Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550791802002003: 43 filings (3.99/100 renter HHs)2004: 37 filings (3.43/100 renter HHs)2007: 41 filings (3.86/100 renter HHs)2008: 53 filings (4.99/100 renter HHs)2009: 38 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2010: 31 filings (2.95/100 renter HHs)2011: 62 filings (4.98/100 renter HHs)2012: 57 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2013: 57 filings (4.58/100 renter HHs)2014: 49 filings (3.94/100 renter HHs)2015: 37 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2016: 51 filings (5.62/100 renter HHs)2017: 50 filings (5.51/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 16% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 156Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.51×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-07-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 7 filings (1.84× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 3 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (1.56× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (1.05× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (1.05× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.87× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.26× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cudahy

The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. 36% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Milwaukee County average of 45.8%. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10.

Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.3/10. Court records carry 606 eviction filings across 13 observed years.

The worst year on record was 2011, when 5.0% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Milwaukee Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.2% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 42nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Milwaukee County average of 4.5 closely.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079180200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079180200?

Census tract 55079180200 in Cudahy scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079180200?

Median gross rent is $991/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079180200?

14.7% of residents in tract 55079180200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,438.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079180200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 37th, minority 34th, housing 32th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079180200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 606 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 55079180200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.23% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 55079180200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.51× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 55079180200 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 55079180200 compare to Cudahy overall?

Tract 55079180200 scores 4/10, right in line with the parent city of Cudahy at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cudahy eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 55079180200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cudahy

Top eight tracts in Cudahy ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related