Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally

Six Points Eviction Risk: Moderate , West Allis

Tract 55079012900 · Milwaukee County, WI · pop 2,982 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 55079012900 covers part of the Six Points area of Milwaukee, WI, and scores 4.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,982. 34% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Milwaukee County average of 45.8%.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 23% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,191
Renter share35.2%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate20.7%
Median income$70,208

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Six Points
Very High
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#131 of 210 tracts In West Allis
Low
Within county
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#135 of 301 tracts In Milwaukee County
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#303 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across West Allis and the region

Centroid at 43.0281, -87.9999 · click any tract to drill in

Why Six Points scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from West Allis
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
20.7% poverty · this tract
5.2
Supply constraint
$996 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from West Allis
2.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from West Allis
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from West Allis
5.5

How Six Points compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Six Points risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 012900West Allis: 4.14.1West Allisparent cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 218Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 2.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.7%Peak (2015)
  • 21Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 550790129002003: 21 filings (3.93/100 renter HHs)2004: 10 filings (1.87/100 renter HHs)2007: 13 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2008: 18 filings (3.54/100 renter HHs)2009: 16 filings (3.14/100 renter HHs)2010: 19 filings (3.44/100 renter HHs)2011: 14 filings (2.13/100 renter HHs)2012: 15 filings (2.28/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (2.28/100 renter HHs)2014: 23 filings (3.50/100 renter HHs)2015: 24 filings (3.65/100 renter HHs)2016: 9 filings (1.62/100 renter HHs)2017: 21 filings (3.79/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 96Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.96×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 4 filings (3.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (8.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (6.25× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Milwaukee, WI as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Six Points. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Six Points

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 8.1/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.5/10. The filing record is not thin: 218 evictions over 13 years of observation.

The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The worst year on record was 2015, when 3.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 2.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 58th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 5.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $70,208, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the WI average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 55079012900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55079012900?

Census tract 55079012900 in the Six Points neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 55079012900?

Median gross rent is $996/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 55079012900?

20.7% of residents in tract 55079012900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,982.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 55079012900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 46th, minority 45th, housing 37th.
Q5

Is tract 55079012900 considered part of Six Points?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55079012900 fall within Six Points (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55079012900?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 218 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 55079012900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.90% of renter households, peaking at 3.7% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 55079012900 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.96× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Milwaukee eviction risk, WI), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 55079012900 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 55079012900 compare to West Allis overall?

Tract 55079012900 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of West Allis at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from West Allis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 55079012900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 97% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in West Allis

Top eight tracts in West Allis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related