Oconomowoc Eviction Risk: Lower

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.4/10. Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.9/10.

Food insecurity runs 7.3% against 17.8% nationally. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.3/10. Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally.

That is riskier than roughly 27% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $136,204, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

43% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.