Within parent city
54
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Birmingham Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 01073005200 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,826
Census tract 01073005200 covers part of Birmingham, AL, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 68% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units1,523
Renter share45.8%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate27.1%
Median income$31,158
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
86
th percentile
High
Within state
95
th percentile
Very High
National
70
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.4807, -86.8509 · click any tract to drill in
Why Birmingham scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
27.1% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$1,031 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0
How Birmingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 84
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 75%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 8%Grade C
- 40%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 385Total filings over 11 yrs
- 6.98%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.7%Peak (2001)
- 34Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 26% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.9%Housing insecurity
- 21.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 39.0%Food insecurity
- 34.7%SNAP enrollment
- 18.4%Transit barriers
- 13.2%No health insurance
- 18.2%Frequent mental distress
- 47.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Birmingham
The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $31,158 and the ratio lands at 40%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
SNAP participation runs 34.7% against 15.2% nationally. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Housing insecurity runs 26.9% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. Court records carry 385 eviction filings across 11 observed years. The worst year on record was 2001, when 11.7% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 7.0% of renter households face a filing.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073005200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073005200?
Census tract 01073005200 in Birmingham scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073005200?
Median gross rent is $1,031/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073005200?
27.1% of residents in tract 01073005200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,826.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073005200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 75th, minority 97th, housing 35th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073005200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 385 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073005200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.98% of renter households, peaking at 11.7% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 01073005200 struggle to pay rent?
About 26.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 01073005200 compare to Birmingham overall?
Tract 01073005200 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 01073005200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 40% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
North Birmingham
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Fourth Avenue Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Pratt City
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Smithfield Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Automotive Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Pratt City
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01073005907
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Smithfield Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related