Within parent city
47
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Birmingham Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 01073003600 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 4,417
Census tract 01073003600 covers part of Birmingham, AL, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,417. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,839
Renter share27.9%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate22.1%
Median income$47,878
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
69
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
95
th percentile
Very High
National
70
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Birmingham and the region
Centroid at 33.4847, -86.8982 · click any tract to drill in
Why Birmingham scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Birmingham
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
22.1% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$1,169 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Birmingham
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Birmingham
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Birmingham
3.0
How Birmingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 69
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 69%Socioeconomic
- 43%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 57%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 34%Grade B
- 13%Grade C
- 29%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 290Total filings over 11 yrs
- 5.07%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.5%Peak (2001)
- 16Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 56% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.4%Housing insecurity
- 18.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 33.7%Food insecurity
- 27.8%SNAP enrollment
- 15.6%Transit barriers
- 10.9%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 42.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Birmingham
Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 33.7% against 17.8% nationally.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.8/10. The poverty rate is 22%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. It sits 1.1 points above the Jefferson County average of 4.3.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 290 filings here across 11 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 9.5% of renter households.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 5.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073003600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073003600?
Census tract 01073003600 in Birmingham scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073003600?
Median gross rent is $1,169/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073003600?
22.1% of residents in tract 01073003600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,417.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073003600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 43th, minority 96th, housing 57th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073003600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 290 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073003600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.07% of renter households, peaking at 9.5% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 01073003600 struggle to pay rent?
About 24.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 01073003600 compare to Birmingham overall?
Tract 01073003600 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Birmingham at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Birmingham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 01073003600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 29% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Birmingham
Top eight tracts in Birmingham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
Marks Village
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Ensley
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Smithfield Historic District
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
East Lake
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Hobson
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
01073005103
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Marks Village
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · AL
Ensley
5.4
/ 10 · Moderate
Related