Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #10,885 of 84,120 nationally

Fairfield Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 01073010604 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 5,334 · 97% of tract blocks fall in Fairfield

Fairfield is where census tract 01073010604 sits, home to 5,334 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 7.1/10. On the national scale it ranks #3,291 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 67% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 58% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,305 a month while the average household earns $30,985 a year, roughly 51% of income at the averages. About 49% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 16% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,676
Renter share48.8%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate39.3%
Median income$30,985

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Fairfield
Very High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#45 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
National
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#10,885 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fairfield and the region

Centroid at 33.4774, -86.9131 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fairfield scores 6.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fairfield
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
39.3% poverty · this tract
9.8
Supply constraint
$1,305 rent vs county FMR
5.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fairfield
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fairfield
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fairfield
9.4

How Fairfield compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fairfield risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.16.1This tracttract 010604Fairfield: 2.62.6Fairfieldparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 87

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fairfield

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fairfield, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 28.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 22.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073010604

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010604?

Census tract 01073010604 in Fairfield scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073010604?

Median gross rent is $1,305/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010604?

39.3% of residents in tract 01073010604 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,334.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010604?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 53th, minority 93th, housing 94th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 01073010604 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 01073010604 compare to Fairfield overall?

Tract 01073010604 scores 6.1/10, higher than the parent city of Fairfield at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fairfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 01073010604 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 42% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fairfield

Top eight tracts in Fairfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related