Nottingham Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale
Tract 01073010806 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 6,088 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Eviction risk in the Nottingham area of Irondale centers on tract 01073010806, which scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 6,088 residents. That is riskier than about 44% of US census tracts.
52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 52% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $155,566 a year. Renters make up 5% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Irondale and the region
Centroid at 33.5032, -86.7049 · click any tract to drill in
Why Nottingham scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Nottingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 7%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Nottingham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.8%Housing insecurity
- 3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 3.1%SNAP enrollment
- 3.7%Transit barriers
- 4.1%No health insurance
- 12.0%Frequent mental distress
- 24.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Nottingham
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irondale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Part of this tract, about 1% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was A ("Best"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
In CDC survey modeling, about 4.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 01073010806
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010806?
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010806?
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010806?
Is tract 01073010806 considered part of Nottingham?
What share of households in tract 01073010806 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 01073010806 compare to Irondale overall?
Was tract 01073010806 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Irondale
Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.