Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Nottingham Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale
Tract 01073010806 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 6,088 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
01073010806 is a census tract in the Nottingham area of Mountain Brook, AL. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 6,088 residents. The severe-burden share is 52%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,224
Renter share5.3%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$155,566
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Within county
13
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Irondale and the region
Centroid at 33.5032, -86.7049 · click any tract to drill in
Why Nottingham scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irondale
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irondale
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irondale
3.3
How Nottingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 5%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 7%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Nottingham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.8%Housing insecurity
- 3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 3.1%SNAP enrollment
- 3.7%Transit barriers
- 4.1%No health insurance
- 12.0%Frequent mental distress
- 24.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Nottingham
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. It sits 1.3 points below the Jefferson County average of 4.3. Cost burden runs 52% here against 46.3% across Jefferson County.
Adults with no health insurance runs 4.1% against 11.3% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 5% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.1/10. Statewide the AL average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073010806
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010806?
Census tract 01073010806 in the Nottingham neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010806?
3.3% of residents in tract 01073010806 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,088.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010806?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 5th, minority 14th, housing 3th.
Q4
Is tract 01073010806 considered part of Nottingham?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010806 fall within Nottingham (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 01073010806 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 01073010806 compare to Irondale overall?
Tract 01073010806 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Irondale at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 01073010806 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Irondale
Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related