Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Nottingham Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale

Tract 01073010806 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 6,088 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Eviction risk in the Nottingham area of Irondale centers on tract 01073010806, which scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 6,088 residents. That is riskier than about 44% of US census tracts.

52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 52% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $155,566 a year. Renters make up 5% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 3% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units2,224
Renter share5.3%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate3.3%
Median income$155,566

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Nottingham
Very Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Irondale
Low
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#188 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Very Low
Within state
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#1,416 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irondale and the region

Centroid at 33.5032, -86.7049 · click any tract to drill in

Why Nottingham scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
3.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irondale
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irondale
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irondale
3.3

How Nottingham compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Nottingham risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 010806Irondale: 2.72.7Irondaleparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Nottingham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Nottingham

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irondale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Part of this tract, about 1% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was A ("Best"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073010806

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010806?

Census tract 01073010806 in the Nottingham neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010806?

3.3% of residents in tract 01073010806 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,088.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010806?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 5th, minority 14th, housing 3th.
Q4

Is tract 01073010806 considered part of Nottingham?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010806 fall within Nottingham (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 01073010806 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 01073010806 compare to Irondale overall?

Tract 01073010806 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Irondale at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 01073010806 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irondale

Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related