Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Nottingham Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale
Tract 01073010803 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 6,257 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
01073010803 is a census tract in the Nottingham area of Irondale, AL. It scores 3/10 for landlords. The voucher gap is 31.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units2,734
Renter share41.1%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate7.4%
Median income$98,125
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
25
th percentile
Low
Within county
12
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
33
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Irondale and the region
Centroid at 33.5123, -86.7176 · click any tract to drill in
Why Nottingham scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
7.4% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,666 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irondale
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irondale
6.3
How Nottingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 41%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 29%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 447Total filings over 11 yrs
- 7.05%Avg annual filing rate
- 18.9%Peak (2013)
- 12Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Nottingham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.9%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.0%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 13.7%Frequent mental distress
- 25.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Nottingham
The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Pulling hardest the other way is state political climate at 1.8/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.8/10.
At $1,666 a month, rents run 26% over what the rest of Irondale commands. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.
It sits 1.3 points below the Jefferson County average of 4.3. SNAP participation runs 5.1% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 9.0% against 17.8% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 447 evictions over 11 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2013 at 18.9% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 7.0% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073010803
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010803?
Census tract 01073010803 in the Nottingham neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073010803?
Median gross rent is $1,666/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010803?
7.4% of residents in tract 01073010803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,257.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010803?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 22th, minority 51th, housing 29th.
Q5
Is tract 01073010803 considered part of Nottingham?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010803 fall within Nottingham (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073010803?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 447 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073010803 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.05% of renter households, peaking at 18.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073010803 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073010803 compare to Irondale overall?
Tract 01073010803 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Irondale at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01073010803 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Irondale
Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related