Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally
Nottingham Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale
Tract 01073010803 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 6,257 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
For landlords sizing up the Nottingham area of Irondale, census tract 01073010803 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. That is riskier than roughly 66% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 43% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,666 a month while the average household earns $98,125 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 41% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units2,734
Renter share41.1%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate7.4%
Median income$98,125
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
25
th percentile
Low
Within county
26
th percentile
Low
Within state
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Irondale and the region
Centroid at 33.5123, -86.7176 · click any tract to drill in
Why Nottingham scores 2.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
7.4% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,666 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irondale
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irondale
6.3
How Nottingham compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 41%Socioeconomic
- 22%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 29%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 447Total filings over 11 yrs
- 7.05%Avg annual filing rate
- 18.9%Peak (2013)
- 12Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Nottingham. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.9%Housing insecurity
- 5.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.0%Food insecurity
- 5.1%SNAP enrollment
- 5.5%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 13.7%Frequent mental distress
- 25.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Nottingham
What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irondale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 2% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073010803
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010803?
Census tract 01073010803 in the Nottingham neighborhood scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073010803?
Median gross rent is $1,666/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010803?
7.4% of residents in tract 01073010803 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,257.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010803?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 22th, minority 51th, housing 29th.
Q5
Is tract 01073010803 considered part of Nottingham?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010803 fall within Nottingham (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073010803?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 447 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073010803 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.05% of renter households, peaking at 18.9% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073010803 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073010803 compare to Irondale overall?
Tract 01073010803 scores 2.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Irondale at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01073010803 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Irondale
Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related