Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Country Club Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Mobile

Tract 01097003502 · Mobile County, AL · pop 2,757 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 01097003502 covers part of the Country Club Village area of Mobile, AL, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,757. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 8% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,016
Renter share15.7%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate1.9%
Median income$144,889

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Country Club Village
Low
Within parent city
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#69 of 78 tracts In Mobile
Very Low
Within county
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#130 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Very Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#968 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mobile and the region

Centroid at 30.6859, -88.1588 · click any tract to drill in

Why Country Club Village scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mobile
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
1.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,200 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mobile
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mobile
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mobile
3.0

How Country Club Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Country Club Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0035023.6Mobileparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 76Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 5.56%Avg annual filing rate
  • 22.9%Peak (2014)
  • 6Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01097003502
Filings dropped 33% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Country Club Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Country Club Village

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

Food insecurity runs 4.9% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 2.4% against 15.2% nationally.

49% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Mobile County average of 43.6%. Against the Mobile County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.

Court records carry 76 eviction filings across 10 observed years. Average gross rent is $1,200, 12% above the Mobile average. The worst year on record was 2014, when 22.9% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 5.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097003502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097003502?

Census tract 01097003502 in the Country Club Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097003502?

Median gross rent is $1,200/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097003502?

1.9% of residents in tract 01097003502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,757.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097003502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 15th, minority 9th, housing 16th.
Q5

Is tract 01097003502 considered part of Country Club Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097003502 fall within Country Club Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097003502?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 76 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097003502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.56% of renter households, peaking at 22.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097003502 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097003502 compare to Mobile overall?

Tract 01097003502 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Mobile at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mobile eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mobile

Top eight tracts in Mobile ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related