Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Country Club Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Mobile

Tract 01097003608 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,048 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

01097003608 is a census tract in the Country Club Village area of Mobile, AL. It scores 3.6/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,048. 41% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 6% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units484
Renter share15.5%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$44,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Country Club Village
Very High
Within parent city
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#51 of 78 tracts In Mobile
Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#77 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Moderate
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#741 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mobile and the region

Centroid at 30.7053, -88.1836 · click any tract to drill in

Why Country Club Village scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mobile
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$771 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mobile
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mobile
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mobile
3.0

How Country Club Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Country Club Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.6This tracttract 0036083.6Mobileparent city4.0Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 173Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 14.69%Avg annual filing rate
  • 19.7%Peak (2002)
  • 16Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01097003608
Filings dropped 20% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Country Club Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Country Club Village

Cost burden runs 61% here against 43.6% across Mobile County. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. At $771 a month, rents run 28% under what the rest of Mobile commands.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2/10. The filing record is not thin: 173 evictions over 10 years of observation.

Filings peaked in 2002 at 19.7% of renter households. In a typical year about 14.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 33% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 4.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the Mobile County average of 4.0 closely. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $44,583.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097003608

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097003608?

Census tract 01097003608 in the Country Club Village neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097003608?

Median gross rent is $771/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097003608?

10.9% of residents in tract 01097003608 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,048.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097003608?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 47th, minority 82th, housing 16th.
Q5

Is tract 01097003608 considered part of Country Club Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097003608 fall within Country Club Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097003608?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 173 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097003608 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.69% of renter households, peaking at 19.7% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097003608 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097003608 compare to Mobile overall?

Tract 01097003608 scores 3.6/10, right in line with the parent city of Mobile at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mobile eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mobile

Top eight tracts in Mobile ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related