Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally
Young Forte Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Montgomery
Tract 01101002400 · Montgomery County, AL · pop 1,453 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 01101002400 (the Young Forte Village area of Montgomery, Alabama) comes in at 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 82% of US census tracts.
62% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $861 a month while the average household earns $21,607 a year, roughly 48% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.
Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 11%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units644
Renter share29.5%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate46.8%
Median income$21,607
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
87
th percentile
High
Within county
94
th percentile
Very High
Within state
89
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Montgomery and the region
Centroid at 32.3413, -86.3351 · click any tract to drill in
Why Young Forte Village scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Montgomery
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
46.8% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$861 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Montgomery
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Montgomery
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Montgomery
3.0
How Young Forte Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 88
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 81%Socioeconomic
- 75%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 231Total filings over 9 yrs
- 7.96%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.3%Peak (2008)
- 24Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Young Forte Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 37.5%Housing insecurity
- 32.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 55.2%Food insecurity
- 56.3%SNAP enrollment
- 28.1%Transit barriers
- 18.1%No health insurance
- 21.3%Frequent mental distress
- 56.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Young Forte Village
The heaviest input here is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Montgomery eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Montgomery County average of 5.4 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 88th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 231 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 8.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.3% of renter households in 2008.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 01101002400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01101002400?
Census tract 01101002400 in the Young Forte Village neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01101002400?
Median gross rent is $861/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01101002400?
46.8% of residents in tract 01101002400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,453.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01101002400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 75th, minority 99th, housing 82th.
Q5
Is tract 01101002400 considered part of Young Forte Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01101002400 fall within Young Forte Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01101002400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 231 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 01101002400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.96% of renter households, peaking at 11.3% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01101002400 struggle to pay rent?
About 37.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 32.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01101002400 compare to Montgomery overall?
Tract 01101002400 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Montgomery at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Montgomery eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 01101002400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Montgomery
Top eight tracts in Montgomery ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · AL
01101001600
5.9
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Maxwell Heights
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01101005614
5.8
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Garden District
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01101002902
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01101000400
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
01101002201
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · AL
Cloverdale Historic District
5.7
/ 10 · Elevated
Related