Skip to content
Kingman, Arizona eviction risk overview
Ranked #1,413 of 1,861 nationally

Kingman, AZ Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Mohave County · Population 34,375

In 2026
Risk score
4.6
MODERATE

79th percentile, Arizona.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average3.2 Now4.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.5 1977 · score 1.5 1978 · score 1.5 1979 · score 1.6 1980 · score 1.7 1981 · score 1.8 1982 · score 1.8 1983 · score 1.8 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 1.9 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.2 1993 · score 2.2 1994 · score 2.2 1995 · score 2.2 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.6 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.5 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 3.7 2009 · score 3.8 2010 · score 3.9 2011 · score 4.0 2012 · score 4.0 2013 · score 4.1 2014 · score 4.2 2015 · score 4.3 2016 · score 4.6 2017 · score 4.7 2018 · score 4.9 2019 · score 5.1 2020 · score 5.6 2021 · score 5.6 2022 · score 5.6 2023 · score 5.7 2024 · score 4.8 2025 · score 4.6 2026 · score 4.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.2 Regional 3.2 State 2.2 Economic 6.5 Supply 6.4 Rent Control 5.8 Eviction 2.3 Tenant 6.9 Housing 6.1 4.6 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +55.8% (2024)
    3.2
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.2
  3. State political climate
    Arizona legislature & governorship
    2.2
  4. Economic stress
    14.1% poverty · 4.9% unemp.
    6.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,058 average · 31.6% renters
    6.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.7% of income on rent
    5.8
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    38 days filing → judgment
    2.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    31.6% renters
    6.9
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kingman and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Kingman compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Mohave County
Very High
#5 of 41 cities
Rank in county — 90th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 41 cities in Mohave County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Arizona
High
#108 of 464 cities
Rank in state — 77th percentileBottomTop
#108 of 464 cities in Arizona for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Kingman risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Kingman: 4.64.6KingmanThis cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4.6
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 38d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,058/mo. A contested eviction takes 38 days and costs $1,641–$4,634 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 31.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 34,375 residents, 31.6% rent. 29% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 14.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.2
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.2 and 3.2 (GOP margin +55.8% (2024)). State climate at 2.2 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.3, housing court bias 6.1, rent-control risk 5.8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.5. Supply constraint: 6.4. The numbers behind those: 14.1% poverty, 4.9% unemployment, 29% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Kingman sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Tucson, AZ · 43d · ~$3.3k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.6 Tucson Mesa, AZ · 38d · ~$3.1k all-in ($82/day) · score 3.1 Mesa Gilbert, AZ · 37d · ~$3.6k all-in ($97/day) · score 2.4 Gilbert Chandler, AZ · 40d · ~$3.1k all-in ($78/day) · score 2.7 Chandler Glendale, AZ · 42d · ~$3.0k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.6 Glendale Scottsdale, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($88/day) · score 2.4 Scottsdale Peoria, AZ · 37d · ~$3.3k all-in ($90/day) · score 2.7 Peoria Tempe, AZ · 37d · ~$3.0k all-in ($81/day) · score 4.6 Tempe Surprise, AZ · 41d · ~$2.7k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.5 Surprise Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Kingman
Kingman · 38d · ~$3.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 4.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Kingman, AZ

Landlording in Kingman, Arizona, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.6/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Kingman is a city of 34,375 residents where 31.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,058/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Kingman eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.3/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Kingman closes 38 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Kingman's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Kingman runs $1,641 to $4,634 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 38 days of typical timeline and $1,058/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.9/10 in Kingman, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Arizona, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Kingman: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Arizona's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,634 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Kingman

Trap · 14.1%
Local poverty rate is 14.1%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward moderate volume in Mohave County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 5.8/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the rental concentration corridors.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Kingman?

No. You need a legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, a lease violation, or the end of a lease term. Arizona does not have statewide just-cause eviction requirements, meaning for month-to-month leases or after a fixed-term lease expires, you can generally terminate with proper notice (e.g., 30 days) without needing to state a specific "reason" beyond that. However, you can't evict for discriminatory or retaliatory reasons.
Q2

How long does an eviction typically take in Kingman?

The typical eviction timeline in Kingman is around 38 days from the initial notice to regaining possession of your property. This is an average and can vary depending on tenant cooperation, court schedules, and whether the tenant contests the eviction.
Q3

What are the common mistakes landlords make during an eviction?

Common mistakes include improper service of notices, failing to follow statutory timelines, attempting "self-help" evictions (like changing locks or shutting off utilities), accepting partial rent payments after issuing a pay-or-quit notice (which can reset the process), and not having a clear, legally compliant lease agreement.
Q4

Can I keep the security deposit for unpaid rent in Arizona?

Yes, you can deduct unpaid rent from the security deposit. You must provide an itemized statement of deductions to the tenant within 14 business days of them vacating the property. Any remaining balance must be returned to the tenant.
Q5

Is "cash for keys" a legal option in Kingman?

Yes, "cash for keys" is a legal and often recommended strategy. It involves offering a tenant money to voluntarily vacate the property by a specific date, leaving it in good condition. It can save you significant time, legal fees, and potential damage compared to a contested eviction. Always get the agreement in writing.
Q6

Are there any rent control laws in Kingman?

No. Arizona has a statewide preemption against rent control, meaning no city or county in Arizona, including Kingman, can enact rent control measures. This is reflected in Kingman's low rent-control-risk sub-score of 5.8/10, which for Arizona is considered low. You can find more details on our Arizona rent control rules page.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4.6/10 places Kingman in the 79th percentile of Arizona cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.