Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Jingletown Eviction Risk: High , Oakland

Tract 06001406201 · Alameda, CA · pop 5,072 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 06001406201 covers part of the Jingletown area of Oakland, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,072 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 36% Owners 16%
Tract context
Occupied units1,508
Renter share83.8%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate23.7%
Median income$66,518

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Jingletown
Moderate
Within parent city
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#36 of 116 tracts In Oakland
Elevated
Within county
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland and the region

Centroid at 37.7850, -122.2307 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jingletown scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Oakland
9.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
23.7% poverty · this tract
5.9
Supply constraint
$1,531 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Oakland
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Oakland
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Oakland
9.5

How Jingletown compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jingletown risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 406201Oakland: 9.69.6Oaklandparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jingletown

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.7/10. Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. This is renter territory: 84% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

Against the Alameda County average of 7.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.1 points. Against Alameda County at 45.5%, 57% of renters here are cost-burdened. Food insecurity runs 34.0% against 17.8% nationally.

At $1,531 a month, rents run 23% under what the rest of Oakland commands. The poverty rate is 24%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Housing insecurity runs 25.9% against 14.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Oakland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001406201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001406201?

Census tract 06001406201 in the Jingletown neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001406201?

Median gross rent is $1,531/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001406201?

23.7% of residents in tract 06001406201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,072.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001406201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 79th, minority 94th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 06001406201 considered part of Jingletown?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001406201 fall within Jingletown (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001406201 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001406201 compare to Oakland overall?

Tract 06001406201 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Oakland at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Oakland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001406201 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 26% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Oakland

Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related