Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,005 of 84,120 nationally

No sidewalk riding district Eviction Risk: High , Chico

Tract 06007000700 · Butte, CA · pop 4,825 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 06007000700 covers No sidewalk riding district in Chico, home to 4,825 residents. For landlords it grades 8/10, an elevated reading. On the national scale it ranks #7,516 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 60% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,383 monthly, set against $66,340 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35% Stable renters 23% Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,441
Renter share58.3%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate27.8%
Median income$66,340

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In No sidewalk riding district
Very Low
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#8 of 25 tracts In Chico
Elevated
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 54 tracts In Butte
High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#884 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chico and the region

Centroid at 39.7421, -121.8390 · click any tract to drill in

Why No sidewalk riding district scores 8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chico
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
27.8% poverty · this tract
7.0
Supply constraint
$1,383 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chico
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chico
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chico
8.4

How No sidewalk riding district compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
No sidewalk riding district risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.08.0This tracttract 000700Chico: 7.87.8Chicoparent cityCounty: 6.56.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 50

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 18Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 1.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.4%Peak (2014)
  • 18Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within No sidewalk riding district. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in No sidewalk riding district

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chico, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Butte County average of 5.9 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06007000700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06007000700?

Census tract 06007000700 in the No sidewalk riding district neighborhood scores 8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06007000700?

Median gross rent is $1,383/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06007000700?

27.8% of residents in tract 06007000700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,825.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06007000700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 58th, minority 42th, housing 46th.
Q5

Is tract 06007000700 considered part of No sidewalk riding district?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06007000700 fall within No sidewalk riding district (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06007000700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 18 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 06007000700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.44% of renter households, peaking at 1.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 06007000700 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 06007000700 compare to Chico overall?

Tract 06007000700 scores 8/10, right in line with the parent city of Chico at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chico; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chico

Top eight tracts in Chico ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related