Within neighborhood
60
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #798 of 84,120 nationally
No sidewalk riding district Eviction Risk: High , Chico
Tract 06007000604 · Butte, CA · pop 4,519 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
With a score of 6.9/10, tract 06007000604 in No sidewalk riding district in Chico ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,519 residents. That is riskier than roughly 94% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 62% of renter households, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,281 a month while the average household earns $39,390 a year, roughly 39% of income at the averages. Renters make up 90% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
8.7
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 56%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 10%
Tract context
Occupied units1,771
Renter share89.8%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate38.4%
Median income$39,390
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
92
th percentile
Very High
Within county
96
th percentile
Very High
Within state
97
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Chico and the region
Centroid at 39.7357, -121.8574 · click any tract to drill in
Why No sidewalk riding district scores 8.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Chico
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
38.4% poverty · this tract
9.6
Supply constraint
$1,281 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chico
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chico
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chico
8.4
How No sidewalk riding district compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 78%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 33Total filings over 1 yrs
- 2.51%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.5%Peak (2014)
- 33Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within No sidewalk riding district. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.9%Housing insecurity
- 12.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 28.8%Food insecurity
- 29.6%SNAP enrollment
- 18.2%Transit barriers
- 11.9%No health insurance
- 26.3%Frequent mental distress
- 35.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in No sidewalk riding district
What moves this score most is economic stress at 9.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chico, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Butte County average of 5.9 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 20.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 33 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 2.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.5% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06007000604
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06007000604?
Census tract 06007000604 in the No sidewalk riding district neighborhood scores 8.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06007000604?
Median gross rent is $1,281/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06007000604?
38.4% of residents in tract 06007000604 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,519.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06007000604?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 9th, minority 54th, housing 78th.
Q5
Is tract 06007000604 considered part of No sidewalk riding district?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06007000604 fall within No sidewalk riding district (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06007000604?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 33 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 06007000604 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.51% of renter households, peaking at 2.5% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 06007000604 struggle to pay rent?
About 20.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 06007000604 compare to Chico overall?
Tract 06007000604 scores 8.7/10, higher than the parent city of Chico at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chico; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Chico
Top eight tracts in Chico ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · CA
No sidewalk riding district
8.8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
No sidewalk riding district
8.7
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
No sidewalk riding district
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
No sidewalk riding district
8.6
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06007001200
8.5
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06007001300
8.5
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
No sidewalk riding district
8
/ 10 · High
Tract · CA
06007000300
7.7
/ 10 · High
Related
Explore the geography around tract 06007000604
Parent city ↑
Chico
7.8 / 10
Parent county ↑
Butte
Parent state ↑
California
Sibling tract →
No sidewalk riding district
8.7 / 10
Sibling tract →
No sidewalk riding district
8.6 / 10
Sibling tract →
No sidewalk riding district
8.6 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts