Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,433 of 84,120 nationally

The Flats Eviction Risk: Elevated , Beverly Hills

Tract 06037701000 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 5,178 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 7.7/10, tract 06037701000 in the The Flats area of Beverly Hills, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,178 residents. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10.

Risk score
7.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29% Stable renters 39% Owners 32%
Tract context
Occupied units2,550
Renter share68.9%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$139,340

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In The Flats
Very Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Beverly Hills
Low
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#1,765 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#4,025 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Beverly Hills and the region

Centroid at 34.0619, -118.4058 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Flats scores 7.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Beverly Hills
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$3,027 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beverly Hills
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beverly Hills
6.3

How The Flats compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Flats risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.77.7This tracttract 701000Beverly Hills: 9.19.1Beverly Hillsparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Flats. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Flats

28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 43% of renters here are cost-burdened.

This is renter territory: 69% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.7/10.

The voucher gap is 15.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.3% against 11.3% nationally.

It sits 0.7 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.3% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #9,433 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037701000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037701000?

Census tract 06037701000 in the The Flats neighborhood scores 7.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037701000?

Median gross rent is $3,027/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037701000?

7.9% of residents in tract 06037701000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,178.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037701000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 20th, minority 43th, housing 22th.
Q5

Is tract 06037701000 considered part of The Flats?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037701000 fall within The Flats (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037701000 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037701000 compare to Beverly Hills overall?

Tract 06037701000 scores 7.7/10, lower than the parent city of Beverly Hills at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beverly Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037701000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Beverly Hills

Top eight tracts in Beverly Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related