Census Tract · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally
Citrus Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06037404203 ·
Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,309 · 66% of tract blocks fall in Citrus
Census tract 06037404203 covers part of Citrus, CA, and scores 6.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. The main counterweight is supply constraint at 1.6/10.
Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%Stable renters 24%Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units912
Renter share51.5%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate11.3%
Median income$85,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 3 tracts In Citrus
Very High
Within county
22th percentile
#1,949 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
41th percentile
#5,398 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
84th percentile
#13,349 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Citrus and the region
Centroid at 34.1251, -117.8857 · click any tract to drill in
Why Citrus scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Citrus
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.3% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$1,730 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Citrus
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Citrus
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Citrus
6.3
How Citrus compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 81
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
17.6%Housing insecurity
7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
20.6%Food insecurity
15.9%SNAP enrollment
11.4%Transit barriers
11.3%No health insurance
20.1%Frequent mental distress
30.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Citrus
Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. At $1,730 a month, rents run 26% under what the rest of Citrus commands. It sits 1.5 points below the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.6/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.5/10. On the national scale it lands near the 84th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. 53% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $85,250. 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037404203
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037404203?
Census tract 06037404203 in Citrus scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037404203?
Median gross rent is $1,730/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037404203?
11.3% of residents in tract 06037404203 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,309.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037404203?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 40th, minority 87th, housing 85th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06037404203 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06037404203 compare to Citrus overall?
Tract 06037404203 scores 6.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Citrus at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Citrus; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Citrus
Top eight tracts in Citrus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.