Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally

Burbank Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06037310300 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,089

Tract 06037310300 sits in Burbank, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.9/10. The severe-burden share is 45%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 5% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,128
Renter share11.3%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$137,955

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 26 tracts In Burbank
Very Low
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#1,942 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#5,398 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#13,349 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Burbank and the region

Centroid at 34.1991, -118.3179 · click any tract to drill in

Why Burbank scores 6.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Burbank
7.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Burbank
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Burbank
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Burbank
6.7

How Burbank compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Burbank risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.96.9This tracttract 310300Burbank: 8.38.3Burbankparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Burbank

At $3,501 a month, rents run 60% over what the rest of Burbank commands. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running cool, economic stress reads 1.1/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points.

Adults with no health insurance runs 3.5% against 11.3% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.4/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037310300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037310300?

Census tract 06037310300 in Burbank scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037310300?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037310300?

4.5% of residents in tract 06037310300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,089.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037310300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 25th, minority 44th, housing 1th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037310300 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037310300 compare to Burbank overall?

Tract 06037310300 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Burbank at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Burbank; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 06037310300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Burbank

Top eight tracts in Burbank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related