Burbank Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06037310300 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,089
Tract 06037310300 sits in Burbank, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.9/10. The severe-burden share is 45%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Burbank and the region
Centroid at 34.1991, -118.3179 · click any tract to drill in
Why Burbank scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Burbank compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 4
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 18%Socioeconomic
- 25%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 1%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.8%Housing insecurity
- 3.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.1%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 4.5%Transit barriers
- 3.5%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Burbank
At $3,501 a month, rents run 60% over what the rest of Burbank commands. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10. The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Running cool, economic stress reads 1.1/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.3/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.5 points.
Adults with no health insurance runs 3.5% against 11.3% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.4/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037310300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037310300?
What is the average rent in tract 06037310300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037310300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037310300?
What share of households in tract 06037310300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037310300 compare to Burbank overall?
Was tract 06037310300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Burbank
Top eight tracts in Burbank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.