California Country Club Estates Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037269300 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,763 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 8.4/10, tract 06037269300 in the California Country Club Estates area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0445, -118.4122 · click any tract to drill in
Why California Country Club Estates scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow California Country Club Estates compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 24%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 14%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 21%Grade A
- 26%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within California Country Club Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.1%Housing insecurity
- 2.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.9%Food insecurity
- 3.9%SNAP enrollment
- 3.5%Transit barriers
- 2.7%No health insurance
- 11.8%Frequent mental distress
- 20.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in California Country Club Estates
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. At $2,727 a month, rents run 41% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
Housing insecurity runs 5.1% against 14.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.5% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 14% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
Social vulnerability reads 1.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $230,893, annual rent is just 14%.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037269300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037269300?
What is the average rent in tract 06037269300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037269300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037269300?
Is tract 06037269300 considered part of California Country Club Estates?
What share of households in tract 06037269300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037269300 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037269300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.