California Country Club Estates Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037269907 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,452 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Tract 06037269907 sits in the California eviction laws Country Club Estates area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.4/10. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0280, -118.4067 · click any tract to drill in
Why California Country Club Estates scores 9.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow California Country Club Estates compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 61%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 71%Racial/ethnic minority
- 55%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 77%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within California Country Club Estates. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.4%Food insecurity
- 8.5%SNAP enrollment
- 6.4%Transit barriers
- 5.3%No health insurance
- 15.9%Frequent mental distress
- 20.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in California Country Club Estates
95% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. At $2,193 a month, rents run 13% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $98,229.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037269907
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037269907?
What is the average rent in tract 06037269907?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037269907?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037269907?
Is tract 06037269907 considered part of California Country Club Estates?
What share of households in tract 06037269907 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037269907 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037269907 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.