Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Downtown Culver City Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037269906 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,327 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

06037269906 is a census tract in the Downtown Culver City area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. Cost burden runs 33% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 63% Owners 5%
Tract context
Occupied units1,590
Renter share95.1%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$123,720

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Downtown Culver City
Low
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#1,035 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,500 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0250, -118.4032 · click any tract to drill in

Why Downtown Culver City scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,572 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Downtown Culver City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Downtown Culver City risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 269906Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Downtown Culver City. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Downtown Culver City

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. 95% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. At $2,572 a month, rents run 33% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Disability prevalence runs 18.2% against 31.5% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 4.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037269906

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037269906?

Census tract 06037269906 in the Downtown Culver City neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037269906?

Median gross rent is $2,572/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037269906?

3.4% of residents in tract 06037269906 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,327.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037269906?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 3th, minority 74th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 06037269906 considered part of Downtown Culver City?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037269906 fall within Downtown Culver City (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037269906 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037269906 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037269906 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037269906 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related