Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037191710 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,670 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 06037191710 sits in the Larchmont area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Annualized rent equals 53% of average household income of $29,387, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 61% Stable renters 31% Owners 8%

Tract context

Occupied units1,211

Renter share91.8%

SVI overall0.98

Poverty rate30.3%

Median income$29,387

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0855, -118.3192 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

30.3% poverty · this tract

7.6

Supply constraint

$1,309 rent vs county FMR

1.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

99%Socioeconomic
64%Household composition
90%Racial/ethnic minority
99%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
29%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

31.2%Housing insecurity
16.4%Utility-shutoff threat
43.1%Food insecurity
44.8%SNAP enrollment
21.0%Transit barriers
23.2%No health insurance
21.6%Frequent mental distress
46.3%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larchmont

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. SNAP participation runs 44.8% against 15.2% nationally. 34% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. This is renter territory: 92% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, around two-thirds of renters here are cost-burdened. At $1,309 a month, rents run 32% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

Housing insecurity runs 31.2% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037191710

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037191710?

Census tract 06037191710 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037191710?

Median gross rent is $1,309/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037191710?

30.3% of residents in tract 06037191710 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,670.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037191710?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 64th, minority 90th, housing 99th.

Is tract 06037191710 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037191710 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037191710 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037191710 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037191710 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037191710 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 29% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.