Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037208610 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,274 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 06037208610 sits in the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Population here is 4,274. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 48% Owners 11%

Tract context

Occupied units1,474

Renter share89.1%

SVI overall0.95

Poverty rate15.7%

Median income$75,761

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0722, -118.2818 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

15.7% poverty · this tract

3.9

Supply constraint

$1,742 rent vs county FMR

1.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Little Bangladesh compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

95%Socioeconomic
60%Household composition
91%Racial/ethnic minority
96%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
30%Grade C
70%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

19.0%Housing insecurity
8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
26.2%Food insecurity
22.4%SNAP enrollment
12.2%Transit barriers
12.6%No health insurance
16.5%Frequent mental distress
32.0%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 89% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

24% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 46% of renters here are cost-burdened. Food insecurity runs 26.2% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 22.4% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,742, 10% below the Los Angeles average.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 9.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037208610

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037208610?

Census tract 06037208610 in the Little Bangladesh neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037208610?

Median gross rent is $1,742/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037208610?

15.7% of residents in tract 06037208610 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,274.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037208610?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 60th, minority 91th, housing 96th.

Is tract 06037208610 considered part of Little Bangladesh?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037208610 fall within Little Bangladesh (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037208610 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037208610 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037208610 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037208610 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 70% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.