Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Flower District Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037206302 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,271 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037206302 in the Flower District area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 58% Owners 0%
Tract context
Occupied units660
Renter share100.0%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate67.5%
Median income$7,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Flower District
Elevated
Within parent city
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#175 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#286 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0427, -118.2456 · click any tract to drill in

Why Flower District scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
67.5% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Flower District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Flower District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 206302Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Flower District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Flower District

Housing insecurity runs 39.9% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 67%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

On the high side, economic stress reads 10/10. 100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 28.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. 42% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037206302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037206302?

Census tract 06037206302 in the Flower District neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037206302?

67.5% of residents in tract 06037206302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,271.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037206302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 14th, minority 84th, housing 91th.
Q4

Is tract 06037206302 considered part of Flower District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037206302 fall within Flower District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037206302 struggle to pay rent?

About 39.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 28.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037206302 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037206302 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related