Little Italy Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037297120 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,264 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Tract 06037297120 sits in the Little Italy area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 33.7282, -118.2851 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little Italy scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Little Italy compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 93
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 78%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 89%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 76%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little Italy. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.2%Housing insecurity
- 9.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.2%Food insecurity
- 23.0%SNAP enrollment
- 12.7%Transit barriers
- 15.9%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 34.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Little Italy
30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
Cost burden runs 64% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. 66% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.
The poverty rate is 20%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Average gross rent is $1,626, 16% below the Los Angeles average.
Food insecurity runs 26.2% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 23.0% against 15.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037297120
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037297120?
What is the average rent in tract 06037297120?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037297120?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037297120?
Is tract 06037297120 considered part of Little Italy?
What share of households in tract 06037297120 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037297120 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037297120 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.