Silver Lake Heights Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037187102 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,637 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037187102 in the Silver Lake Heights area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.1090, -118.2515 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Lake Heights scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Lake Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 72%Socioeconomic
- 56%Household composition
- 87%Racial/ethnic minority
- 62%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 24%Grade C
- 2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Lake Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.9%Housing insecurity
- 8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.4%Food insecurity
- 20.5%SNAP enrollment
- 10.8%Transit barriers
- 11.6%No health insurance
- 16.2%Frequent mental distress
- 31.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Lake Heights
30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
Cost burden runs 64% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. 67% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. The poverty rate is 20%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
At $1,626 a month, rents run 16% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037187102
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037187102?
What is the average rent in tract 06037187102?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037187102?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037187102?
Is tract 06037187102 considered part of Silver Lake Heights?
What share of households in tract 06037187102 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037187102 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037187102 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.