Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #9,927 of 84,120 nationally
San Fernando Mall Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06037320300 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 6,315 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 7.6/10, tract 06037320300 in the San Fernando Mall area of San Fernando, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 39%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
7.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,940
Renter share38.2%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate10.4%
Median income$73,080
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
29
th percentile
Low
Within state
54
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across San Fernando and the region
Centroid at 34.2821, -118.4459 · click any tract to drill in
Why San Fernando Mall scores 7.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from San Fernando
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.4% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$1,660 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Fernando
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Fernando
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Fernando
7.2
How San Fernando Mall compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 83%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 97%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 23%Grade C
- 35%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within San Fernando Mall. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.8%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 27.8%Food insecurity
- 21.6%SNAP enrollment
- 12.9%Transit barriers
- 20.5%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 35.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in San Fernando Mall
The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.1/10. 67% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10. Housing insecurity runs 23.8% against 14.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 20.5% against 11.3% nationally.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.8 points. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 88th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,660, close to the San Fernando average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037320300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037320300?
Census tract 06037320300 in the San Fernando Mall neighborhood scores 7.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037320300?
Median gross rent is $1,660/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037320300?
10.4% of residents in tract 06037320300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,315.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037320300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 85th, minority 96th, housing 97th.
Q5
Is tract 06037320300 considered part of San Fernando Mall?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037320300 fall within San Fernando Mall (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037320300 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037320300 compare to San Fernando overall?
Tract 06037320300 scores 7.6/10, right in line with the parent city of San Fernando at 7.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Fernando; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037320300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 35% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in San Fernando
Top eight tracts in San Fernando ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related