Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

Village Green Eviction Risk: Elevated , Los Angeles

Tract 06037320101 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,446 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 06037320101 sits in the Village Green area of San Fernando, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. It is home to 3,446 residents. Cost burden runs 77% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 4% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units941
Renter share18.4%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$110,967

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 18 tracts In Village Green
Very Low
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Los Angeles
Low
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#2,093 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.2993, -118.4327 · click any tract to drill in

Why Village Green scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,016 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
7.2

How Village Green compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Village Green risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 320101Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 52

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Village Green. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Village Green

35% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9.1/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.1/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.8/10. Average gross rent is $2,016, 15% above the San Fernando average.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 81st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 18% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.7/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $110,967.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037320101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037320101?

Census tract 06037320101 in the Village Green neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037320101?

Median gross rent is $2,016/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 77% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037320101?

8.4% of residents in tract 06037320101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,446.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037320101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 31th, minority 92th, housing 21th.
Q5

Is tract 06037320101 considered part of Village Green?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037320101 fall within Village Green (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037320101 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037320101 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037320101 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037320101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related