Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Sherman Oaks Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037141306 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,076 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

06037141306 is a census tract in the Sherman Oaks area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 31% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,551
Renter share72.5%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate1.6%
Median income$102,917

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 14 tracts In Sherman Oaks
Very Low
Within parent city
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#949 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,421 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.1506, -118.4629 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sherman Oaks scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,659 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Sherman Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sherman Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 141306Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sherman Oaks. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sherman Oaks

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. At $2,659 a month, rents run 38% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. 27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Adults with no health insurance runs 3.2% against 11.3% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.2% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.4/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037141306

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037141306?

Census tract 06037141306 in the Sherman Oaks neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037141306?

Median gross rent is $2,659/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037141306?

1.6% of residents in tract 06037141306 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,076.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037141306?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 3th, minority 54th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 06037141306 considered part of Sherman Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037141306 fall within Sherman Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037141306 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037141306 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037141306 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037141306 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related