Country Club Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037221304 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,674 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037221304 in the Country Club Park area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,674. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0454, -118.3146 · click any tract to drill in
Why Country Club Park scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Country Club Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 98%Socioeconomic
- 91%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Country Club Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 27.8%Housing insecurity
- 13.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 37.0%Food insecurity
- 36.0%SNAP enrollment
- 17.3%Transit barriers
- 17.9%No health insurance
- 19.2%Frequent mental distress
- 39.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Country Club Park
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. 91% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
SNAP participation runs 36.0% against 15.2% nationally. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Food insecurity runs 37.0% against 17.8% nationally.
Set annual rent against average income of $54,620 and the ratio lands at 34%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. The severe-burden share is 21%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. Average gross rent is $1,530, 21% below the Los Angeles average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037221304
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037221304?
What is the average rent in tract 06037221304?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037221304?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037221304?
Is tract 06037221304 considered part of Country Club Park?
What share of households in tract 06037221304 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037221304 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037221304 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.