Silver Lake Heights Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037197410 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,725 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
06037197410 is a census tract in the Silver Lake Heights area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,725. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0929, -118.2504 · click any tract to drill in
Why Silver Lake Heights scores 8.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Silver Lake Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 56%Socioeconomic
- 30%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 55%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 79%Grade C
- 21%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Silver Lake Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.7%Food insecurity
- 9.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 6.3%No health insurance
- 15.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Silver Lake Heights
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. 44% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%.
Food insecurity runs 10.7% against 17.8% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,119, 10% above the Los Angeles average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.8/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. It tracks the Los Angeles County average of 8.4 closely. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $97,480.
45% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037197410
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037197410?
What is the average rent in tract 06037197410?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037197410?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037197410?
Is tract 06037197410 considered part of Silver Lake Heights?
What share of households in tract 06037197410 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037197410 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037197410 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.