Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

The Flats Eviction Risk: High , Beverly Hills

Tract 06037214903 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 1,507 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037214903 in the The Flats area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 59%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 55% Stable renters 26% Owners 19%
Tract context
Occupied units1,101
Renter share80.7%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate24.9%
Median income$62,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 7 tracts In The Flats
Very High
Within parent city
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#340 of 1,117 tracts In Beverly Hills
Elevated
Within county
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#378 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Beverly Hills and the region

Centroid at 34.0742, -118.3892 · click any tract to drill in

Why The Flats scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
24.9% poverty · this tract
6.2
Supply constraint
$2,258 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beverly Hills
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beverly Hills
9.0

How The Flats compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
The Flats risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 214903Beverly Hills: 9.19.1Beverly Hillsparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within The Flats. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in The Flats

The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 68% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Set annual rent against average income of $62,583 and the ratio lands at 43%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. 81% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. The poverty rate is 25%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Average gross rent is $2,258, 17% above the Los Angeles average.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 5.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037214903

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037214903?

Census tract 06037214903 in the The Flats neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037214903?

Median gross rent is $2,258/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037214903?

24.9% of residents in tract 06037214903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,507.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037214903?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 32th, minority 46th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 06037214903 considered part of The Flats?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037214903 fall within The Flats (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037214903 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037214903 compare to Beverly Hills overall?

Tract 06037214903 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Beverly Hills at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beverly Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037214903 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Beverly Hills

Top eight tracts in Beverly Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related